habe das hier gerade in den weiten des internets entdeckt. interessante sache, wenn man was remixen will, man aber nur den vocal track und den instrumental track hat (is ja in der regel der fall bei US-maxis).
Zitat:
Dsico How to: No.2 DIY ACAPELLAS
Find an instrumental version of the track. CD Singles are the best source, as the digital recording & pressing techniques are more likely to give a perfect copy of the backing track, which is something that you need. Mp3s are not likely to give good results as the compression method removes some of the audio data that may be required. Recording from vinyl may work if you do both recordings under exactly the same conditions (any pitch variation will reduce the effectiveness of this technique). Just rip the audio tracks to wav files, or another uncompressed format, .AIF etc, using an Audio Extracter/Ripper.
The basic idea relies on the linear superposition of audio. Which is simply: that if you have take a sound, any sound at all, and add it to the inverted version of itself the result will be silence.
Note: Occasionally the instrumental on the CD Single will have a slightly different arrangement or structure. basically you are screwed in this case. (it won't be this simple but you may be able to salvage something). A rough guide when you're considering buying that CD single is "Are the two tracks exactly the same length?" if they are, then there is a good chance the engineer just muted the vocal track when they did the instrumental, which could result in a nice clean acapella.
Step 2: Matching Them Up
Now that you have the Instrumental Version its a matter of mathcing the two songs exactly. i.e. to the sample. The best thing for this is a wave editor like Soundforge, Peak, Cooledit,......etc
Radio version vs Instrumental
As you can see these two look pretty close except for the vocal sections. Thats a good start. By zooming in on the first beat of the Radio Version you get a better picture of the shape of the waveform. You want to find a distinctive little waveshape that you can then look for in the instrumental (or vice versa). for example I just focussed on this little click at the begining of the track:
Find a Distinctive Waveform Shape
After you find the same section in the second track you can start trying to line them up so that the spikes fall on EXACTLY the same sample position. Personally I just delete sections from the beginning of either until the sample no. readout of the spikes is exactly the same. This makes it much easier to do the "paste mix" later.
Match Up the Two Tracks
Step 3 : Mix 'Em Together
The rest is rather simple, just invert one of the tracks, say the instrumental, ("Select All" then apply an "Invert Waveform" function or similar) and mix the inverted instrumental with the orignal aligned radio version the result may be a pretty clean acapella.
to Mix the two:
In Soundforge I just select the entire song (try and find a "Select All" command). Now copy that into the clipboard. ie just Copy it. ("Ctrl + C" or "Option + C"). Select the other version from the begining of the track and PASTE MIX or similar type function. You may need to fiddle with the repective volumes of the two as there may be differences in the mastered loudness. Thats about it. The idea is that now that they are aligned it is very easy to do a paste mix where the two waveforms will fall directly ontop of each other (but inverted) and hence cancel out. This will leave only the difference between the two (the vocal)
Although there will most likely still be some semblance of drums and stuff through into the acapella, This is probably due to post production mastering differences (multiband compression, maximising reverb etc..) between the Instrumental version and the radio edit. I've also noticed ther is often some nasty digital noise, its low in the mix but you can hear it in the straight acapella, I've been curious as to why that is there, and well I don't know. It could be due to dither (which is the process of purposefully adding noise to digital recordings) as it should be random each time so it won't cancel out.
Invert
As you can see its a pretty simple process. But its the only way to get a reasonably clean and good quality vocal from a full mixed track. Just a couple of notes on some other rumoured methods of creating acapellas:
1. EQ out the Backing: I've heard people talk about EQing the backing track out of the mix, utter bullshit. It can't be done without destroying the vocal as well. The tonal range of the human voice is also within the range of most musical instruments it will never work.
2. Karaoke Versions: There was an old school method to create a vocal free version of a song. Which relied on the notion that the left and right channels of most instruments are well out of phase however the vocal as it is mono and mixed center is not. Thus mixing say, the right channel with an inverted left will result in a vocal free version. This will give you an "instrumental" or a rough one. You can not use that in this process: some simple algebra will explain why it will not work.
A little EQ afterwards will help clean it up and maybe a touch of multiband compression to emphasis the vocal and add some dynamic noise reduciton. Otherwise you could be sweet. By the way, I noticed that the Eminem "Cleaning OUt my Closet" CD Single has an Acapella that is exactly the same length as the vocal version. Haven't tried myself but I almost bought it for that single reason.
naja, habe es mal ausprobiert gerade..theoretisch gehts. das heisst, wenn man exakt die gleiche datei zweimal lädt, eine davon invertiert und dann beide übereinanderlegt, heben die sich auf, und es bleibt nur noch stille..aber mit vinyl ripps hats nicht funktioniert. man kriegt die nicht exakt genug übereinander gelegt und das instrumental ist auch meist nicht exakt gleich wie das in der vocal version..hat also nicht wirklich geklappt.
angeblich gehts mit cd versionen, die man gerippt hat..keine ahnung.
ist aber zumindest ne interesante sache
